Seal of the United States

From Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 13:15, 30 July 2007 (edit)
Bcraig (Talk | contribs)
m
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:57, 25 November 2009) (edit) (undo)
ABerkes (Talk | contribs)
(normalized citations)
 
(7 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
-The Second Continental Congress appointed a committee on July 4, 1776, the day of the Declaration was adopted, to select a design for a '''United States seal'''. Original members were [[John Adams]], [[Benjamin Franklin]], and [[Thomas Jefferson|Jefferson]]. The committee submitted its recommendation on August 20, 1776, but Congress delayed its approval for 6 years, during which time it appointed two additional committees. The seal as proposed by Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson changed considerably in the intervening years.+The Second Continental Congress appointed a committee on July 4, 1776, the day the [[Declaration of Independence]] was adopted, to select a design for a '''United States seal'''. The original members were [[John Adams]], [[Benjamin Franklin]], and [[Thomas Jefferson]]. The committee submitted its recommendation on August 20, 1776, but Congress delayed its approval for 6 years, during which time it appointed two additional committees. The seal as proposed by Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson changed considerably in the intervening years.
[[Image:seal6.jpg|right]] [[Image:seal6.jpg|right]]
-Adams favored the figure of Hercules, contemplating images of Virtue and Sloth, but admitted this was "too complicated a group for a seal or medal, and it is not original."<ref>Adams to Abigail Adams, August 14, 1776. ''Familiar Letters of John Adams and His Wife Abigail Adams, during the Revolution,'' (New York: Hurd and Houghton, 1876), 211; Quoted in [[Short Title List|''PTJ'',]] 1:494.</ref>+Adams favored the figure of Hercules, contemplating images of Virtue and Sloth, but admitted this was "too complicated a group for a seal or medal, and it is not original."<ref>Adams to Abigail Adams, August 14, 1776, in ''Adams Family Correspondence'' (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1963-), 2:96; quoted in [[Short Title List|''PTJ'',]] 1:494.</ref>
Franklin produced a biblical scheme: "Moses standing on the Shore, extending his Hand over the Sea, thereby causing the same to overwhelm Pharaoh who is sitting in an open Chariot, a Crown on his Head and a Sword in his Hand. Rays from a Pillar of Fire in the Clouds, reaching to Moses, to express that he acts by Command of the Deity."<ref>[[Short Title List|''PTJ'',]] 1:494.</ref> Franklin produced a biblical scheme: "Moses standing on the Shore, extending his Hand over the Sea, thereby causing the same to overwhelm Pharaoh who is sitting in an open Chariot, a Crown on his Head and a Sword in his Hand. Rays from a Pillar of Fire in the Clouds, reaching to Moses, to express that he acts by Command of the Deity."<ref>[[Short Title List|''PTJ'',]] 1:494.</ref>
-Jefferson's ideas were similar to Franklin's. But in addition to the emblem of Moses and Pharaoh, Jefferson proposed, on the reverse, "Hengist and Horsa, the Saxon chiefs from whom we claim the honor of being descended, and whose political principles and form of government we have assumed."<ref>John Adams to Abigail Adams, August 14, 1776, ''Familiar Letters of John Adams and His Wife Abigail Adams, during the Revolution,'' (New York: Hurd and Houghton, 1876), 211; Quoted in [[Short Title List|''PTJ'',]] 1:495.</ref>+Jefferson's ideas were similar to Franklin's. But in addition to the emblem of Moses and Pharaoh, Jefferson proposed, on the reverse, "Hengist and Horsa, the Saxon chiefs from whom we claim the honor of being descended, and whose political principles and form of government we have assumed."<ref>John Adams to Abigail Adams, August 14, 1776, in ''Adams Family Correspondence'' (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1963-), 2:96; quoted in [[Short Title List|''PTJ'',]] 1:495.</ref>
-In addition to their individual preferences, the three members of the committee also asked the Philadelphia artist Peirre Eugene du Simitiere for a design. Du Simitiere responded with a shield consisting of the traditional symbols of the six European nations which had settled North America. The shield was surrounded by thirteen shields representing the states and flanked by the goddess of liberty and an American rifleman. It also bore the eye of Providence and the motto "Bello Vel Pace."+In addition to their individual submissions, the three members of the committee also asked the [[Philadelphia]] artist Pierre Eugene du Simitiere for a design. Du Simitiere responded with a shield consisting of the traditional symbols of the six European nations which had settled North America. The shield was surrounded by thirteen shields representing the states and flanked by the goddess of liberty and an American rifleman. It also bore the eye of Providence and the motto "E Pluribus Unum."
[[Image:seal5.jpg|left]] [[Image:seal5.jpg|left]]
-The committee's final proposal consisted of thirteen linked shields, each bearing the designation of a state and the motto "E Pluribus Unum"; the date MDCCLXXVI; and Providence's eye within a triangle. On the reverse was the biblical scene and the motto "Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God." Congress, however, tabled the subject, and Jefferson's direct role came to an end.+The committee's final proposal consisted of thirteen linked shields, each bearing the designation of a state and the motto "E Pluribus Unum"; the date MDCCLXXVI; and Providence's eye within a triangle. On the reverse was the biblical scene and the motto "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to god." Congress, however, tabled the subject, and Jefferson's direct role came to an end.
-New committees took up the matter in 1780 and 1782. Suffice it to say that goddesses, shields, starts, Roman soldiers, Indian warriors, and mottoes came and went. The final result was principally the work of Charles Thomason, a member of the new committee, and William Barton, a Philadelphia lawyer with knowledge of heraldry. Barton's design was similar to du Simitiere's: a central shield flanked by the maiden America and a knight in armor. For the reverse, he proposed a pyramid topped by the eye of God. The knight was replaced by a Continental officer, and then both figures were replaced by an eagle. Thomson is given credit for these simplifications and improvements.+New committees took up the matter in 1780 and 1782. Suffice it to say that goddesses, shields, starts, Roman soldiers, Indian warriors, and mottoes came and went. The final result was principally the work of Charles Thomson, a member of the new committee, and William Barton, a Philadelphia lawyer with a knowledge of heraldry. Barton's design was similar to du Simitiere's: a central shield flanked by the maiden America and a knight in armor. For the reverse, he proposed a pyramid topped by the eye of God. The knight was replaced by a Continental officer, and then both figures were replaced by an eagle. Thomson is given credit for these simplifications and improvements.
Jefferson thus had nothing to do with the selection of the eagle. His committee, however, did contribute several elements which were incorporated into the seal: the eye of Providence, the date, the shield, and "E Pluribus Unum." Jefferson thus had nothing to do with the selection of the eagle. His committee, however, did contribute several elements which were incorporated into the seal: the eye of Providence, the date, the shield, and "E Pluribus Unum."
-Writing to his daughter in 1784, Franklin offers wry comments on the Society of the Cincinnati. He finds their newly-minted medals "tolerably done," but notes that "all such things are criticis'd," some faulting the Latin, the title, or the bald eagle. "For my own part," he adds, "I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen as the Representative of our Country; he is a Bird of bad moral Character." Franklin is in fact pleased that the eagle on the Cincinnati medals looks more like a turkey, since "the turk'y is in comparison a much more respectable Bird, and withal a true original Native of America." Though "a little vain and silly," the turkey remains "a Bird of Courage," who would quickly attack any British grenadier "who should presume to invade the FarmYard with a red coat on."<ref>Franklin to Sarah Bache, January 26, 1784, Benjamin Franklin, http://tjportal.monticello.org/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=3303 ''Writings'',] (New York: Library of America, 1987), 1087-1088.</ref> We have yet to find if Jefferson had similar sentiments for eagles or turkeys.+Writing to his daughter in 1784, Franklin offers wry comments on the Society of the Cincinnati. He finds their newly-minted medals "tolerably done," but notes that "all such things are criticis'd," some faulting the Latin, the title, or the bald eagle. "For my own part," he adds, "I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen as the Representative of our Country; he is a Bird of bad moral Character." Franklin was in fact pleased that the eagle on the Cincinnati medals looked more like a turkey, since "the turk'y is in comparison a much more respectable Bird, and withal a true original Native of America." Though "a little vain and silly," the turkey remains "a Bird of Courage," who would quickly attack any British grenadier "who should presume to invade the FarmYard with a red coat on."<ref>Franklin to Sarah Bache, January 26, 1784, in Benjamin Franklin, [http://tjportal.monticello.org/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=3303 ''Writings''] (New York: Library of America, 1987), 1087-1088. [http://franklinpapers.org/franklin/framedVolumes.jsp?vol=41&page=281 Transcription] of letter available online from the Papers of Benjamin Franklin.</ref> As for Jefferson, no such evidence of a strong preference towards either the turkey or the eagle has been found.
==Footnotes== ==Footnotes==
<references/> <references/>
 +
 +==Further Sources==
 +*Patterson, Richard Sharpe and Richardson Dougall. [http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/4268298 ''The Eagle and the Shield: A History of the Great Seal of the United States.''] Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1976.
 +*"Report on a Seal for the United States, with Related Papers," in [[Short Title List|''PTJ'']], 1:494-7.
 +*United States Department of State. "Great Seal." [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/rls/dos/9087.htm http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/rls/dos/9087.htm]
[[Category:Politics]] [[Category:Politics]]

Current revision

The Second Continental Congress appointed a committee on July 4, 1776, the day the Declaration of Independence was adopted, to select a design for a United States seal. The original members were John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson. The committee submitted its recommendation on August 20, 1776, but Congress delayed its approval for 6 years, during which time it appointed two additional committees. The seal as proposed by Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson changed considerably in the intervening years.

Adams favored the figure of Hercules, contemplating images of Virtue and Sloth, but admitted this was "too complicated a group for a seal or medal, and it is not original."[1]

Franklin produced a biblical scheme: "Moses standing on the Shore, extending his Hand over the Sea, thereby causing the same to overwhelm Pharaoh who is sitting in an open Chariot, a Crown on his Head and a Sword in his Hand. Rays from a Pillar of Fire in the Clouds, reaching to Moses, to express that he acts by Command of the Deity."[2]

Jefferson's ideas were similar to Franklin's. But in addition to the emblem of Moses and Pharaoh, Jefferson proposed, on the reverse, "Hengist and Horsa, the Saxon chiefs from whom we claim the honor of being descended, and whose political principles and form of government we have assumed."[3]

In addition to their individual submissions, the three members of the committee also asked the Philadelphia artist Pierre Eugene du Simitiere for a design. Du Simitiere responded with a shield consisting of the traditional symbols of the six European nations which had settled North America. The shield was surrounded by thirteen shields representing the states and flanked by the goddess of liberty and an American rifleman. It also bore the eye of Providence and the motto "E Pluribus Unum."

The committee's final proposal consisted of thirteen linked shields, each bearing the designation of a state and the motto "E Pluribus Unum"; the date MDCCLXXVI; and Providence's eye within a triangle. On the reverse was the biblical scene and the motto "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to god." Congress, however, tabled the subject, and Jefferson's direct role came to an end.

New committees took up the matter in 1780 and 1782. Suffice it to say that goddesses, shields, starts, Roman soldiers, Indian warriors, and mottoes came and went. The final result was principally the work of Charles Thomson, a member of the new committee, and William Barton, a Philadelphia lawyer with a knowledge of heraldry. Barton's design was similar to du Simitiere's: a central shield flanked by the maiden America and a knight in armor. For the reverse, he proposed a pyramid topped by the eye of God. The knight was replaced by a Continental officer, and then both figures were replaced by an eagle. Thomson is given credit for these simplifications and improvements.

Jefferson thus had nothing to do with the selection of the eagle. His committee, however, did contribute several elements which were incorporated into the seal: the eye of Providence, the date, the shield, and "E Pluribus Unum."

Writing to his daughter in 1784, Franklin offers wry comments on the Society of the Cincinnati. He finds their newly-minted medals "tolerably done," but notes that "all such things are criticis'd," some faulting the Latin, the title, or the bald eagle. "For my own part," he adds, "I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen as the Representative of our Country; he is a Bird of bad moral Character." Franklin was in fact pleased that the eagle on the Cincinnati medals looked more like a turkey, since "the turk'y is in comparison a much more respectable Bird, and withal a true original Native of America." Though "a little vain and silly," the turkey remains "a Bird of Courage," who would quickly attack any British grenadier "who should presume to invade the FarmYard with a red coat on."[4] As for Jefferson, no such evidence of a strong preference towards either the turkey or the eagle has been found.

Footnotes

  1. Adams to Abigail Adams, August 14, 1776, in Adams Family Correspondence (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1963-), 2:96; quoted in PTJ, 1:494.
  2. PTJ, 1:494.
  3. John Adams to Abigail Adams, August 14, 1776, in Adams Family Correspondence (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1963-), 2:96; quoted in PTJ, 1:495.
  4. Franklin to Sarah Bache, January 26, 1784, in Benjamin Franklin, Writings (New York: Library of America, 1987), 1087-1088. Transcription of letter available online from the Papers of Benjamin Franklin.

Further Sources